Saturday, November 18, 2006

License to Kill

Caution: Spoilers Ahead

After a strenuous week at work, I decided to treat myself with a movie. The options at that time were Babel, Casino Royale and the much acclaimed and hated Borat. But, by the time, I left work, the only option available to see was Casino Royale. A Bond movie and having seen all the previous ones, I just had to watch it. I guess, its not so much about the movie or the story but to be able to see all of them. Infact, I have also seen the 1967 spoof of the Bond Movie which has the same name and has the comic genius Peter Sellers as Bond himself.

So what does one expect from a Bond movie, Daredevil and earth defying action, Bond Girls who ooze with sexuality, Bond Villains who have larger than life roles and grandeur plans to rule the world, Car chases which would put mere mortals in awe. And yet, I watch it with all the fascination I can muster. Maybe just to be in a world where it is possible to defeat evil single handedly, maybe to see the world more as a touch of black and white, not having shades of grey.

Yet, I decided to go to the movie to watch all the gadgets, the fascinating cars, the sensuous Bond girls and villains who I would admire them for their plots. But I was pleasantly surprised. This movie is the adaptation of Ian Fleming's first James Bond Novel of the same name published in 1953. But, it is not the same plot. The broad plot is intermixed with today's realities. While the original plot was based on the cold war rivalry between Russia and the West. This was different.

This movie starts at a time where Bond does not have a 00 status. This is a vintage Bond, who is a normal spy and uses his bare hands and his stamina to kill people. We do not see a spectacular mission to set of the movie, but a subdued monochromatic scene where he kills a double agent while reminiscing his first kill. He doesn't waste time on melodrama but clinically kills the enemy like an assassin would do. This scene is a sets the pace of the movie. It is going to be different than all other Bond Movies so far.

This movie is different from all other movies in many different ways. It has the reality of blood money from Africa to the shadow world of terrorism to smooth operators who converts their funds to legitimate means in quite a believable way. The movie does not have glamorous Bond girls and neither the elaborate sex romps which are a hallmark of Bond's persona, but divulges more of Bond the man and his thoughts. There are hardly any swimsuit shots and the one scene is actually a long shot.

Another significant aspect of the movie shows Bond to be not perfect as embodied by Sean Connery and Pierce Brosnan before. This movie gives a glimpse of the way Bond thinks about women. Infact, it is the movie where Bond falls in love and is ultimately betrayed. Bond commits mistakes and at times questions his own judgment. The movie does not have the characters in white or black but shades of grey, self doubt, sacrifice, selfishness and this includes even the love interest of James Bond - Vesper Lynd. Sarcasm and Wit are the hallmark of Lynd's character without showing a hint of skin. Bond attempts to charm her to bed but is torn apart with his real feelings for her.

This is a movie, where M is shown to have a family and is not afraid to reign in James Bond if required. She does not give in to the recklessness to Bond while also acting as shrink to Bond. Q or his successor is notably absent from the movie. Total absence of a car chase which again like the swimsuit is over before it started. But its a phase in Bond's career where he moves on from being rough to being sophisticated. But its a 3 hour movie which is almost riveting, thrilling without having all the aspects of a Bond Movie. Daniel Craig cannot be compared to either Sean Connery or Pierce Brosnan but a more believable Bond and is in his own class.

While it does not have outrageous stunts but it has Bond cleaning up his own blood after an encounter to being the suave gentleman to saying the last line of the movie, "The Bitch is dead". It is truly a different Bond movie having a grittier Bond.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Very well written review KK. But this still doesn't spur me to go and spemnd 8 bucks for a Bond movie simply becoz ive always disliked the Bond character. Larger than life stud, managing to evade speeding cars and bullets, experimenting with gadgets the world wud probably not see for 50 more yrs, at the same time flirting with larger than life lasses.
Gimme a slow, gripping, dialogue intensive drama anyday. I'm certainly an old fashioned movie-goer....there I said it...shoot me :-)

Anonymous said...

Thats what is refreshing in this movie. No speeding cars or gadgets. Plain gut wrenching spy stuff. Something like 'Spygame'. And Bond is shown a human in this movie, love, betrayal, indecision, anger, wit and sarcasm. I think one should watch it to see a different Bond movie where there is no glamour, swimsuits, cars or gadgets.

Anonymous said...

Maybe i'll stick to a DVD release....ur analogy to spygame didn't help too much :-)
Just out of curiousity though, why does eavery new movie have a rating above 8 nowadays on imdb??? Are we really releasing churning out classics every 2nd week?

Anonymous said...

KK - right on the money. Nice movie and nice review. The missing gadgets was a refreshing change, they had gotten from charming to really boring off late.

Anonymous said...

Hi KK,

Ahmm .... thats what the movie is being marketed as - something different - and that is what they are saying to all of us in india - all over - he makes mistakes - he is not the real bond etc etc... -

overall awesome movie...good review kk...although i think the movie is something like taking 5-6 hours to clean a room...having it spic and span and awesome looking ...and then shitting in the middle....then cleaning it up....


the shit is gone ...but it still smells

Anonymous said...

Hilarious comment!!!

Anonymous said...

Very good review KK, and excellent comment jhadiya.
When I went to watch the movie, I kind of expected those gadgets and speedy cars. I was initially disappointed not to see those, but it was a change(refreshing...not sure yet)

For Balls question: why does eavery new movie have a rating above 8 nowadays on imdb?
Here is what I found on wiki:

Sampling is one factor which can lead to results which have a specific bias or are only relevant to a specific subgroup. To illustrate the importance of such factors, consider an example. Suppose that a film's marketing strategy and reputation is such that 90% of its audience are attracted to the particular kind of film; i.e. it does not appeal to a broad audience. Suppose also that the film is very popular among the audience that does see the film and, in addition, that those who feel most strongly about the film are inclined to rate the film online. This combination may lead to very high ratings of the film which do not generalize beyond the people who actually see the film (or possibly even beyond those who actually rate it).

Qualitative description of categories is an important feature of a rating scale. For example, if ony the points 1-10 are given without description, some people may select 10 rarely whereas other may select the category often. If, instead, "10" is described as "near flawless", the category is more likely to mean the same thing to different people. This applies to all categories, not just the extreme points. Even with category descriptions, some may be harsher raters than others. Rater harshness is also a consideration in marking essays in educational contexts.

Anonymous said...

Pushkar,

When would you be sure that the movie was refreshing?

Abhi picture baaki hai mere dost !

Freaks Inc.. Bengaluru.. 15 years 2 months and 8 days later.. Agenda for the meeting: Day 1 1. Paying our respects to the beginning of time ...